So here's a big announcement

I'm pretty sure most of you (Spongey444 certainly did) noticed that I've (Ray) made a grand total of two posts this year, and one is really short and the other one literally ends mid-sentence.

Yeah that's no accident. 

I've talked about whether or not I'll continue this blog for so much I probably sound like a broken record or a Spider-Man reboot cycle, and I'd be willing to bet it'd be a meme if our readership was more than five people. 

But I think the number of updates and posts I've made in the past two years really speaks for itself.

And that's how I know, definitively, that I'm finally beat, at least in the form I've been making this blog into so far.

At the very least, no more long-form posts until at least April. More likely...umm, probably, uh, ever.

There's several reasons for this:

 - it's just not practical. I just don't have the time or personal resources to write long-form posts anymore or post much at all. In fact that's been true the last two years, as the paltry number of posts themselves attest to. Especially with the, let's face it, low readership numbers I have anyway. 

 - I'm not in a good situation right now. If you've been paying attention this has been true...pretty much from day 1 of this blog (in fact arguably I created this blog in the first place because I just haven't been in a good place in a long time, if ever). It's why I decided to outright cancel a collab Spongey and I have been planning for Zombies (er, Z-O-M-B-I-E-S as I keep insisting). I'd like to think the situation will get better April, but I've been saying that so much in the past I think it's just more honest to say, look, it's outright not healthy for me to keep up this blog, I mean it, so in my own best interests I simply won't, because I can't.

 - this wasn't the direction I wanted my blog to take in the first place. The intention was always to copy word-for-word Christian and Sean's style at Girl Meets World Reviewed - that specifically meant a bunch of small updates throughout the week, which is why Mike's contribution to this blog has been so critical. Unfortunately, I forgot about that and instead trying to put everything together into one big lump sum. That completely screwed up the tempo of what I wanted this blog to be. It made every single meaningful post into a three-hour endeavor or more (and I type at 120 WPM!) and it was literally getting to the point where doing posts and updates wasn't healthy - taking away from time I desperately needed for other things, including sleep.

By that I mean, I spent a lot of hours into the night working on this post explaining my ratings system that probably nobody read, and I do blame that consequent lack of sleep for a very serious mental and physical breakdown I had the very next day.

Yeah I'm pretty sure that if I keep doing that for the sake of four or five people, I'm going to very literally end up being dead, I mean it.

So I'm going to quit doing that. Literally, for my own health.

Also, it's very clear to me that traditional blogging is dead anyway.

All the big money (if you want to call it that) is going to YouTube videos, guys with lots of sarcasm and cartoony avatars of themselves (this seems to be mandatory for whatever reason even though I think it's patently stupid). These guys are pretty excellent too - PieGuyRulez, NICKtendo, even the I Hate Everything Guy and our very own (if I can claim ownership of him, which I can't) Spongey444 (stupid avatars included, although I Hate Everything Guy's is, um...downright ugly yeah there's no getting around that).

Especially since I'm too poor to hire someone to make one for me, my stupid

animated avatar for my YouTube videos would probably look like this.

The obvious lead-in would be to say that I'm making my own YouTube channel, which I at least technically have, and I've thought about it plenty of times, but it comes with its own complications:

 - for starters, the same time/resource issues I run into for this blog would def apply to making YouTube videos, probably even moreso since 1.) the expectation would be to upload a video not once a week but several times every week for, well, pretty much the rest of my goddamn life so no, 2.) My equipment is ghetto af, my iPhone barely works (yeah this is pretty much my first and last iPhone, I have to imagine Tesla adopted the Apple consumer model for some reason based on ownership feedback I've been reading on various blogs because it's complete and total garbage) and I'm otherwise stuck with the built-in webcam on my...$100 laptop...which also barely works, probably because I only paid $100 for it and 3.) it also means I have to have regular and immediate access to a guaranteed quiet, uninterrupted space which in this household just doesn't exist (yeah I'm going to outright say it if I haven't already, I pretty much live in a broken-af and miserable family situation that I more or less have to be rescued from).

 - since I want to be a published fiction author I have to tread very carefully with how I do reviews. Give the wrong review to the wrong thing and blammo! your publication prospects just evaporated. This applies doubly so for the type of sarcastic, outright caustic review style that nets the viewership and Patreon support that makes the whole venture financially worthwhile (I'm assuming NICKtendo and PieGuyRulez aren't pursuing the type of young adult author career I am). 

One potential workaround is that I just make an anonymous (or rather, semi-anonymous) separate YouTube channel, but there are hard limits to how "anonymous" you can make that (basically anybody with a functioning brain and Internet connection can figure it out within minutes if not seconds). My first and only practical defense would be relying on my viewership to just simply not care enough to bother and thus bet on their apathy (and indeed I'm taking that same risk on this very blog - which is probably a relatively safe risk to take given, you know, there's about five of you total). I can take further steps like voice disguising/modulation but 1.) there are hard limits to how far you can do that without effecting quality or in this particular case, basic comprehension, 2.) I don't even really know how to do it and 3.) again there are hard limits towards how effective it would even be towards its intended purpose and you start running into diminishing returns almost immediately.

And oh yeah 4.) I just really, really suck as a presenter. I have a really nasally voice (I pretty much sound like Lois Griffin) and I'd bet I'd be obnoxious to listen to anyway.

Actually maybe some voice modulation wouldn't be a bad idea.

That said there are some book reviewers out there that have nabbed their own book deals, but they're not exactly the most caustic ones either. Maybe there's a lesson in that.

So that's basically it. I'm not saying I'm quitting the blog, but if I am going to do updates especially between now and April they're going to be short, minor posts and even the frequency of those would be iffy. But that's how I always envisioned this blog being anyway so who knows maybe it'll work out. I really enjoyed the back-and-forth between Christian and Sean and that's what really inspired the creation of this blog. And I really don't want to say making a YouTube version of this blog is out of the question. Despite the relatively heavy resource investment there are extreme advantages to the video and even YouTube-specific format I cannot ignore, at least if I really want to keep blogging (or vlogging) about Disney Channel, Nickelodeon and tween/teen entertainment in general. Not the least of which (in fact I'll readily admit the biggest factor) being far more lucrative monetization potential, if not from YouTube itself then from Patreon and other third-party monetization vendors. 

Extra Thoughts (yes even on a post like this)

 - Speaking of which that segues into some topics I've always wanted to talk about: it's kind of impossible to ignore the so-called "culture war" going on, a war that (if you don't mind me being political) originated and existed solely on FOX News but has now managed to successfully propagate into the culture-at-large, not coincidentally timing with the rise of a certain President in office right now. That said (and this coming from someone who gleefully self-identifies as a SJW) certain left-wing actors and the left-wing at large isn't exactly innocent of some of the most annoying aspects of this culture war or for that matter helping to propagate it in the first place, either. Again, this was a war started intentionally by FOX News (really decades ago, in the late 90s, as soon as they started this "War on Christmas" nonsense), and like The War on Terror it was a war its instigators very carefully engineered for the other side to lose almost from the mere act of participating in, and whether they realize it or not the Left is indeed losing. 

But I don't really want to talk about that (although I guess I can, but upon request only) but what I do want to talk about is the issue of Patreon now "censoring" certain YouTube channels for political content - and I have to say, again as a self-identifying SJW that not only do I believe this does indeed qualify as a form of censorship, but many channels being effected are outright apolitical. Even if you do believe it's a third-party corporation's right to censor right-wing extremists and Neo-Nazis (and to be fair, I do believe in that right), it's exceedingly clear that handing off those duties to an algorithm is as it stands an outright irresponsible thing to do. At the very least it's troubling implications for any channel looking to monetize their videos, regardless where you stand on the political spectrum or how hard you try to be to be apolitical. If there's one lesson YouTube has taught us over the years that they themselves have ignored, it's that we can't trust algorithms in order to afford us the luxury of just being lazy asses.

I mean, I'm a trans-questioning feminist Liberal who very clearly does not like Trump or FOX News and there's no doubt in my mind that the Patreon algorithm would single me out all the same. And yes you can bet Patreon is using an algorithm in all of this, there's just no way they have actual humans trying to filter this all out (although I could be wrong).

But at the same time, aside from Patreon and YouTube itself (which has its own problems) or PayPal (which not only has its own problems too but are financially/corporately tied in with both Patreon and YouTube anyway) payment/funding alternatives just simply don't exist. So the only thing I can say is, tread carefully and who knows maybe people's behavior will be policed and modified for the better, although I really don't like the idea of people's behavior having to be "policed" in the first place (I advocate people should be outright taught actual behavior habits as part of basic schooling instead, but oh well. The shambles that is the American education system isn't its own topic, it's its own YouTube channel, indeed. Let's just say if I do ever have kids I'm getting the hell out of this country ASAP, I mean it).

One topic that's been very important to me is the idea of cultural arts and expression and the idea of censorship itself, especially with the #MeToo movement. This is only a fraction of what I wanted to talk about but: I mean, Chinatown is to this day one of the most amazing films I've ever seen but...it doesn't take away from the fact that Roman Polanski is, at the very least, accused (and convicted!) of raping a woman. Under circumstances uncannily similar to what my own ex-fiancee had to face. 

I don't know how to balance between the two.

Furthermore, when you do a full boycott of a work based on the actions of a single person, even if that person is the principal player in all that, you're also boycotting the earnings potential of everyone involved. Each movie is effectively a small (or even medium) business onto its own in terms of the people involved and I'm not kidding when I say a boycott puts a lot of those people's livelihoods on the line, even for movies decades old.

I guess what I'm asking is, at what point does a boycott become censorship? At what point does a creative work deserve to be censored? We live in a country where we (allegedly) cherish free speech so much Mein Kampf is readily available and we have entire web communities dedicated to white supremacy. And pedophilia. And how The Handmaid's Tale is actually a brilliant model for society and how we should turn all women and girls into sex slaves and suicide bombers (and no I'm not talking about ISIL/Daesh there are a lot of white dudes in this very country who very seriously think this).

But like I said, I don't know how to balance this. One way might be to let people accused of rape still allow their works to be distributed freely but their personal proceeds go directly to their victims, which is indeed how most modern interpretations of "Son of Sam" laws work now. But, I dunno, maybe the five of you have some thoughts.

 - Now that I've looked at it, Angry Perry looks more like an Angry Ninja Turtle.

Cousins for Live Reviewed

I like this show better than Coop & Cami. Why? I think it just goes back to basic writing - basic, but good writing on the part of Cousins for Life as opposed to...whatever Coop & Cami is trying to do.

Ummm, done?

And now the time has come, uh, again, consecutively: Nickelodeon and Disney Channel Year in Review 2018 (and, uh, 2017)

Happy New Year everyone! And blah blah blah.

So it just occurred to me that we didn't do one of these for 2017. To quote one of my favorite YouTubers, Coop772, Le Whoops.

But anyway, instead of doing a winners and losers and mourning the passing of all the shows that have gone before, let's just combine it all because, well...

...I haven't really been watching much of it.

Hell I haven't even seen a single episode of Knight Squad. The entire show is just gathering dust on my DVR unwatched. Don't worry I resolve to watch that and many more soon.

Of course we all knows what happens to New Year's Resolutions:

Hah, always fun to be topical!

Anyway, for Disney Channel, we quite famously (or even infamously?) lost Girl Meets World way early in 2017, nearly exactly two years ago and 

The Thundermans Reviewed: The Thunder Games

The time has come.

No. If you're looking at this review, you don't need to adjust your eyes. The review of the Thundermans series finale has finally arrived after months of delays and anticipation. You wanted it, you prayed for it, you demanded it. And now, in the final days of 2018, you're getting it.

Okay, none of that actually happened but you know where I'm going with this. This review has been a long time coming. You might recall back in May that I announced that I was going to review the last five episodes of The Thundermans, including the series finale right here. The other four episodes preceding it would become mini-reviews. Because Nickelodeon needed to get this show off the air as quickly as possible, they decided to burn off the remaining episodes in one night on May 25, and the one-hour series finale didn't even air at 8:00, but at 8:30. I mocked this decision at the time, especially since all these episodes were coming on Friday night, and Thundermans episodes traditionally aired on Saturday nights. To make matters worse, Nickelodeon aired all the final episodes in reruns the very next night, using the same model I suggested with "The Thunder Games" starting at 8:00 like it should have. So, yeah. The scheduling here will always be ridiculous in my mind.

Anyway, my plan was to write a review of the series finale first and then a further review about the current state of Nickelodeon since the show was leaving. That further review is definitely more necessary now than it was in May. However, I started putting it on hold for no apparent reason. Procrastination took control of me, days became weeks, weeks became months, and now, we're here. One thing I wanted to do sooner rather than later was to review this episode before it was too late. I'm just happy it aired on TeenNick the other day and I was scrolling through channels at just the right time to record it. Since the episode came a week ago, you could call it a Christmas miracle.

By the way, happy new year, everybody. Maybe 2019 will be less disgusting than the last couple years.

I decided not to review the last four episodes and just focus on the series finale. In May, it would have been a nice tie-in. Now, I don't really see the point, especially since this show is not serialized. Anyway, here we go. "The Thunder Games" review is underway.

So, the main story here is that Phoebe and Max have reached the final round of Z-Force training and end up winning a spot. However, the Z-Force commander Dirk Trumbo doesn't want both of them because they don't share a twin power, making them the exact same superhero. Dirk makes the two compete against each other for the spot. Meanwhile, it is revealed that Dr. Colosso has a long-lost son competing for a Z-Force spot named Balfour, otherwise known as "The Gamer" (played by Joey Bragg from Liv & Maddie). When he loses to Phoebe and Max, Balfour seeks revenge on the Thundermans for turning his father into a bunny.

Okay, now what can I really say here? The one thing I liked about The Thundermans is that unlike a lot of other live-action kids shows, it was able to have genuinely dramatic moments without it feeling jarring or out of place. Emotional scenes actually had an impact when they needed to. However, in this episode, I feel like the drama the show usually brings to the table isn't here. Balfour isn't a convincing villain at all, and I almost feel like that's the point. This episode should be about Phoebe and Max, and by extension, the entire Thunderman family. But having to create a new character, give him a backstory, tie him in with the family somehow, and then have him get his revenge while Phoebe and Max are trying to get into the Z-Force feels like too much for one episode, even if it is two parts. A storyline like that could have been its own episode, and it's not like "The Thunder Games" needed it. It feels contrived and a little forced. Like I said, The Thundermans has succeeded with drama before, but this time, it felt unnecessary to have when the main story was enough to justify it.

Another thing that brought this episode down was the clash of different tones. At least until the end, it felt like I couldn't take anything seriously. Balfour was so comical, so cartoonish with what he was doing that none of it really struck a chord with me. Like I said, a story about Dr. Colosso teaming up with his long-lost son to destroy the Thundermans, and Colosso having trouble with taking out Max because he felt like more of a son than Balfour did, could have been its own one-hour episode. Maybe it has to do with who was cast. Joey Bragg is funny here to an extent, but you can tell that they wanted him to be silly when the episode should have called for him to be more serious. Now, I'm over here thinking that this is how Joey normally acted on Liv & Maddie.

However, if I can give this episode any credit, it's to the scene where Phoebe and Max discover their twin power. The scene is dramatic in a way that some of the best Thundermans episodes have been, and the actors really sell the horrors of being lobotomized. Chris Tallman normally had to be comedic in the series, but some of his best moments as Hank were when things got serious. Like when he told Max that there was no turning back if he went down the villainous path, or right here in this episode when he tells his family that they're all going down together. It becomes genuinely emotional for a moment. It finally feels like the characters were taking the situation seriously, and from that point forward, the episode became much better. Unfortunately, it was near the end so it improved a little bit too late.

In the end, the episode was satisfying enough that I feel like the series went out strong. Phoebe and Max were chosen to lead the Z-Force (renamed as the T-Force for Thunderman) after Dirk was fired and turned into a coffee gofer. The entire Thunderman family gets hired by Phoebe and Max to join the T-Force, officially making them all superheroes. The ending actually brings the series full-circle: The family moved to Hiddenville for a normal life, but five years later, their normal life was what they were trying to run away from the whole time.

The Thundermans arrived at a time when Nickelodeon was in a transitional period. iCarly, Victorious, and Big Time Rush had all ended within a year, and those shows had anchored the network in the early 2010s. Shows like How to Rock barely lasted a minute on the network. This was around the time where Nickelodeon was treating its live-action programming like a fire sale, getting rid of any shows that were breathing. The Thundermans was able to avoid that mentality and become the top show on Nickelodeon in less than a year, mostly because of mediocre competition and other potential shows not even being given a chance to survive. You could say that it helped anchor the network in the mid-2010s the same way its predecessors did a few years prior. In the end, it was able to maintain a consistent quality and entertain me, so while it was far from what Nickelodeon made in its glory days, or even a few years before its premiere, it might be the last decent live-action show that the network produces for quite some time.

Then again, I Am Frankie is still taking up space on my DVR and I might want to review it at some point, so we'll see how much my previous statement holds up.

Episode Grade: B-
Episode MVP: Kira Kosarin and Jack Griffo. The series started with them, and ended with them. It was their show from the beginning, and they were the ones that gave Phoebe and Max their own little charm as a contrast to other characters Nickelodeon has had in the last few years. I'm not going to be emotional, but it was a damn good run from these two.
Series MVP: Kira Kosarin and Jack Griffo

EXTRA THOUGHTS 
-I always wondered why they never changed the intro, even after Billy and Nora got noticeably older. Phoebe and Max also look slightly older than they did in the pilot episode, but I guess they were easier to get away with.

-Now that I mention Billy, Diego Velazquez's voice sounded like it went through reverse puberty in this episode. I say this because Billy sounds closer to what he sounded like in the earlier seasons than he has in season four. Did the producers digitally alter his voice? He definitely sounds younger here.

-I always thought it was funny how the characters made such a big deal about Max's "swoosh" haircut. Like it was a part of his identity.

-Now that the series is over, the theme song is gone as well. One of the best theme songs in the last couple years is no longer around which creates another problem: The last decent show on Nick is taking the network's last really good theme song away. Not named The Loud House.

-Again, it's just weird how the Balfour storyline is treated so comedically, especially when it could have made a great episode on its own. Dr. Colosso finds out he has a son, and doesn't seem to give that much of a damn about him or the situation. Also, Balfour gets turned into a bunny so I guess he can bond with his father over making fun of the family.

-I don't think I'm breaking new ground by saying this, but The Thundermans was never a really funny show. It was always just kinda amusing in terms of comedy. That mentality also appears in this episode because there was a lack of really good jokes. There were two in particular that I thought were great: Phoebe and Max are ahead of Balfour in the Z-Force challenges, but they just stand there and watch Balfour catch up to them. They then wonder why they're letting this happen and continue the challenges. Later on, with both of them being bunnies, Dr. Colosso tries to get Balfour to say something sarcastic towards the twins, but he just tells Max to die in a stern voice. Max's disturbed expression was fantastic.

-A great way to wrap everything up as the Thundermans go to fight some crime at the end of the episode. Phoebe breaks the fourth wall and changes the family photo from the opening sequence into them as superheroes, symbolizing who they will always be.

Quite possibly the worst book I've ever read in my life

No I'm not going to type it all here because I don't want to rewrite what I already wrote on Goodreads and I can just paste a link to it here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/2644453074?book_show_action=false&from_review_page=1

Spoiler alert: it's getting an F--, the lowest grade this blog bothers to "reward." And believe me, it really does live up to that F--.

Other Thoughts:

 maybe some updates on what's been going on personally and an end-of-year Disney Channel and Nickelodeon review hopefully tonight or at least tomorrow. The current state of both networks is going to force some changes to how I usually format them. Also I'd really like to respond and add to Mike's review of G.I. Jessie as requested (literally everyone who's been reading this blog has been requesting it - which isn't hard because again there's like three of you).

Season 2 of Raven's Home is about as bad as Season 2 of Bunk'd now

Season 2 of Bunk'd was bad by basically doubling-down on how bad Season 1 was. Jorge became even more of an offensive stereotype to the point where one has to wonder just how in the world can the writing staff get away with this while employed by a company officially endorsing "The Force is Female" shirts and I really have to wonder how Mateo Arias was even able to live with himself like this; and the same with Nina Lui's character, just, not quite as bad; and just...more garbage plots.

But Season 2 of Raven's Home is bad, equally bad, but in a different way. It's just simply as if the writing staff of that show just...doesn't know how to actually write a show. The Bunk'd crew clearly know how to write a comedy, they just seemingly almost deliberately did it bad, awful and at worst (and way too often) downright offensively. As for the S2 Raven's Home crew, it's as if they've been thrown into a situation they have no idea how to get themselves out of. It's like they took, I dunno, the studio custodial team or the caterers and told them, ok guys now you're writing a tween sitcom.

Before I go on I just want to point out who that writing staff is. I have no idea - well, I mean, they literally tell you in the credits, that's the sole reason why credits exist, but unlike with what I'm going to call Disney Channel Classic (Lizzie McGuire all the way to as recent as last year with Bizaardvark and Andi Mack) I don't feel particularly compelled to pay attention anymore - up to a point. I do know that the S1 crew was Entertainment Force - the same crew that put together Best Friends Whenever? Man I miss Best Friends Whenever I loved that show. And now it's November 13 with the frying pan for some reason, and the pug dog...whatever. Obviously they pulled a I Didn't Do It and switched out the production crew between seasons, and just like with I Didn't Do It it was for the worst.

And an additional note regarding just what the hell do I mean when I talk about Entertainment Force, and November 13, and pug dogs, and Bon Mot (Pamela Eells O'Connell's team, of Suite Life and Jessie fame) and all this other random nonsense - so there's a difference between network, studio and production company. The network - in this case Disney Channel - is quite simply the network or channel that occupies a spot on your TV range that airs these programs. The studio - in this case It's a Laugh Productions - is the actual entity that makes the TV show, i.e. films it - it's exactly as you classically imagine a studio lot as being like the classic Columbia and Paramount lots of yore with the giant airplane hangar-like soundstages and tour groups. Except in this specific case It's A Laugh Productions is a wholly-owned sub-entity of ABC Television Productions that's the actual studio where these shows are produced (likewise with Horizon, which is literally the same thing except shows that are single-cam format are labeled as Horizon productions instead for some reason) but that difference is quite frankly immaterial. Huge chunks of the crew, including important personnel like directors such as Micheal Dean Seaton and Rick I Forgot His Name are more than free to wander about the studio lot onto other ABC productions, or even other lots entirely like CBS Television and FOX Television (although I guess FOX and ABC are the same thing now...). And then you have the actual production crew - which includes a core group of writers and producers (or more specifically, showrunners) that basically have formed a posse and hang out together making TV shows. They can be fairly decently-sized groups or as little as two people or even a single individual. They're completely and totally mercenary (at least in theory) going around freelance-style to whatever studios happen to pick up their shows for production, and whatever networks happen to pick up those shows for actual airing.

This is what those different groups like Bon Mot, Entertainment Force, November 13 whatever are. They're effectively just freelance creative brain trusts made up of a few selective individuals.

Perhaps the best-known and best-illustrative example is Bad Robot - what it boils down to is that that just means it's a J.J. Abrams production. But J.J. Abrams isn't the actual production studio or network/film distributor - he lacks that infrastructure and is still dependent on pitching his ideas to those entities and hope they will pick them up (or hope that they'll commission him for projects as is the case with Star Trek and Star Wars). Or with Jerry Bruckheimer productions which - well I hope it's kinda self-explanatory who's the big guy behind that one is. Or Shore Z, which is the posse David Shore (House and now The Good Doctor) has formed around himself. Although in practice most if not all of these production crews are practically in-house for Disney Channel anyway since they meet and work together under the circumstances of being employed by Disney. Oops Donuts is actually one of the few notable exceptions since they do a show for Nickelodeon for now but it's still obviously solidly in the realm of primarily tween entertainment. And (at least traditionally) most Disney Channel productions don't have a separate production entity at all, effectively making by default It's A Laugh Productions both the actual studio and production posse crew. It's people who command a lot of clout, talent or both - like Ron Hart and John Beck of Oops Donuts and Pamela Eells O'Connell of Bon Mot - who get to "declare" their own production company as far as Disney's concerned (or are brought in from the outside with that kind of resources already in place - again just like with the examples I just named).

But that's not really the main point of this post, the main point is to talk about how...these guys don't know what they're doing with Raven's Home. It feels like I'm watching a sitcom put together by exactly the demographic this show's aimed at, but very clearly being in the demo is distinct from understanding the demo, or at least having the talent to pull it off. The plots and the writing of the characters just feel...extremely detached from reality in a very particular way. I don't want to go so far as what AV Club once said of the infamous Secret Life of the American Teenager and claim it's actually produced by aliens who understand Earth only from intercepted television signals. It still feels like it's made by actual human people with regular, normal contact with society-at-large and/or who regularly watch television.

But it also feels like it's made by people who are just in over their heads and while they understand the most basic physical fundamentals - they know how to form proper sentences and which end of the camera they need to point at things - the actual concept of writing a script for television and directing actors is a concept far, far beyond their current level of expertise and training.

Season 2 Grade: It's an F. In all intellectual honesty I don't know what other kind of grade to give it. I don't remember what grade I gave Bunk'd Season 2 but...it's an F. Just watching Raven's Home is such an awkward experience I can't really get through an episode which...really should mean an automatic F.

...well, I take that back. The show was pretty OK up until after the Siezemore Returns arc. That was actually pretty good up until after that point and I really enjoyed that arc. But then right after that...it felt like a different show entirely, let alone suddenly a drastically different Season 3. There's this Scut thing, and then there's this little kid who's the kid of the landlord, and...just stuff. Like I said, just too awkward to really watch through.

Season 2 MVP: Eeehhhh...I mean the kid actors try to carry it through their best as if nothing'sh happened and I'd give them credit for that. Raven...eh I guess. But really, I'm not sure how to reward this.

On why I haven't been posting lately

...so I'm looking at the time and, umm...this is bad timing because I gotta get up early in the morning.

Expect a longer post in here but long story short...my life's a mess.

I'm not kidding. This is the lowest point I've been at in over four years. And I'm the guy who makes posts about being into Disney Channel in the first place because my fiancee dumped me when I found out I had cancer.

But yeah. So there's that.

Extra Thoughts

 - There's a lot to cover here. The two-episode story arc of Andi Mack about the gun thing could probably get a week's worth of stuff alone because I'm basically doing that in real life (the thing about stopping guns in schools, not bringing them in, don't get the wrong impression and like I dunno call the cops on me or something plz k thx). Also a thing called Life Sized 2 happened, and yes I have it on my DVR so we're going to cover that.

Also in case you haven't noticed...both Disney Channel and Nickelodeon are in really, truly exceptionally shitty states right now. Yeah we'll cover that too.

Oh yeah and the G.I. Jessie thing don't worry I'll get to that.

Oh yeah and despite feeling so shitty lately I'm making the move to YouTube. I've already got a few videos recorded even! So yeah you'll get to experience what I actually look like and my extremely nasaly voice that makes me sound like male Lois Griffin.