Nickelodeon and Disney Channel 2015 Winners and Losers

It occurred to me that when I did my 2015 "post-mortem" post I really didn't touch on who really won out between Nickelodeon or Disney Channel in 2015, or who were the big winners and losers (both from a subjective quality and objective ratings standpoint) within the two networks. I kind of alluded to it, at least subjectively, though not by much and just focused on what shows left and what shows were new and just some feelings of each. I went into greater depth with my "List of Nick shows that left Nick since iCarly" post but that was over a much broader period than just a year (broad enough for several shows to enter and exit while still having considered successful runs). So, here we go, a more detailed run-down of who "won" or "lost" 2015:

(as usual, Mike and Nick are invited to add as well)

Between the Networks: The Winner of Nickelodeon vs. Disney Channel in 2015: Absolutely No One (but if I had to pick one, Disney Channel by a country mile)

2015 was a low point for both networks, and just the whole idea of tween/teen television entertainment in general really, continuing a trend that popped up since August 2014 (that "Kidocalypse" I keep talking about). And that's from both a quality and objective ratings standpoint. Disney Channel clearly won the ratings war, but even so, one of the top-rated "events" of the network, Girl Meets Texas, gained "highs" that more or less got A.N.T. Farm and Dog With a Blog stunted to three-season status (i.e., canceled) back in the day. Their brand-new high-profile show for the year, Bunk'd, the Jessie spin-off starring Peyton List (i.e., the girl who pretty much looks like a supermodel) struggles to get into the high million range - at this point getting over 2 mil is an amazing success. Best Friends Whenever has had bottom-dwelling ratings and BTS rumor troubles (supposedly Landry Bender and Lauren Taylor don't like each other, if you believe some of the people on Twitter) to the point where its second-season renewal is either a miracle, a concession to a new reality, or both.

Still, that's way better than Nickelodeon. 100 Things to Do Before High School is a bottom-feeder, as far as ratings are concerned. Nicky, Ricky Dicky & Dawn apparently isn't doing much better, or Bella and the Bulldogs. Thundermans was unceremoniously shoved to a Wednesday dead-end slot with those aforementioned shows - and managed to routinely kick Nick's own prime Saturday ratings. Nick's most popular show is a CGI co-production from France starring singing chipmunks from a franchise that got incessantly mocked for the new movie that just came out. Nick needs its original movies just to get to the same ratings level as Girl Meets World or K.C. Undercover. Nick's latest strategy - pump out incredibly cheap shows that can turn a profit no matter how few people watch - is proving that, yes, there comes a point where it doesn't matter how cheap it is, people still need to watch it. It's my understanding that Pig Goat Bananna Cricket has crashed and burned, so even their usually more successful animated and Saturday/Sunday blocks (that more typically compete with Disney XD or Cartoon Network as opposed to Disney Channel) are suffering.

It will be interesting to see where both networks go from here, especially if ratings continue to slide, or what the future of this genre of entertainment will look like. I've been saying for literally months now that I'll touch upon that subject in extreme detail, but during that time in my research I've become absolutely convinced that the future belongs to creator-generated content. In other words, kids will entertain other kids in the future. Maybe 10, 15 years from now the household names won't be the next Selena Gomez or Debby Ryan or Miranda Cosgrove or Ariana Grande, but the next Cameron Dallas or PewDiePie or Ryan Higa (yes I'm old and I need to deal with it). What's also interesting is that apparently there's much more money to be made as a YouTube star than actually working for the "big" corporations of Disney or Nick, particularly as you essentially cut out the middle-man: Smosh makes more money a year than what, for example, Bridgit or Debby made during their entire Disney Channel careers. 

Best TV Show of Both Networks: 100 Things to Do Before High School

This is far and away the most creatively and best written show on either network, with Liv and Maddie being the only real competition. Yes, Scott Fellows still has what it takes, despite Johnny Test (we can just forget about that altogether). It's relatable, yet silly enough to be escapist, and has legitimately interesting story and plots. The production values are also a cut above other shows too (it helps that it's single-camera format, but production values means more than just the quality of camera you use or how many or how few you use or how well-built the props are). It's clear that 100 Things makes great use of all the elements - the skill of its young actors, the directors' ability to wrangle that skill, the writing, everything - to make it stand out among every other show on either network right now.

Runners-Up: Every Witch Way, Talia in the Kitchen, Bella and the Bulldogs, Liv and Maddie

Best TV Show of Nickelodeon: 100 Things to Do Before High School

Well duh if I just got done saying it's the best either network has to offer right now. 

Runners-Up: Every Witch Way, Talia in the Kitchen, Bella and the Bulldogs, Henry Danger

So instead I'll just elaborate on the runners-up. EWW was pretty controversial when it premiered, and it still is half a year after that show's 80-episode run finale. It was Nickelodeon's first comedy telenovela, and the production values and plot developments were jarring for a lot of people - me included. The only reason why I even watched past the first week or even first episode was because at that time I felt like I was experiencing a nadir of programming elsewhere, and that I stuck with it because I was willing to watch anything on Nickelodoen or Disney with a demo older than Dora's. Quite frankly, I'm extremely grateful I did. EWW turned around in about the last third of the first season, and the second season onwards kept building that same momentum. The crew and the cast were finally starting to gel and even began to show off that synergy right on the screen, which is what ultimately made the show work. Yeah, EWW may have had rock-bottom production values and some confusing plot decisions (not helped in that it's actually a 160-episode long series with half of its entire episode count just left sitting on the cutting room floor) but I still think it shows that you can have a very enjoyable, watchable show with nonexistant production values as long as you have a cast that can make it work and, more importantly, have fun. Paola, Paris, yes even Rahart and the others - and don't forget Cinemat head producer/writer Caterina Ledoboer, you really are an inspiration for tweens and teens everywhere on how to have fun with what you make - especially important for that next generation of YouTube stars who will also be facing completely nonexistant budgets.And again with Talia in the Kitchen (pretty much same show, different cast and premise).

Meanwhile, Henry Danger is a return to form for Dan Schneider. Everything that made iCarly and Victorious work, and especially everything that made Drake & Josh work, is coming back with HD's second season. Meanwhile everything that didn't make iCarly and Victorious work seems to be shoved over to Game Shakers. And Bella and the Bulldogs more than a worthy network counterpart to Girl Meets World, to the point where I actually like Bella better (despite what Gawker/Jezebel says - they weren't even trying to review the show in the first place and I'll take it they just viewed the first set of wonky episodes).

Best Show on Disney Channel: Liv and Maddie

There isn't a lot of competition for "Best" on Disney Channel right now since the older shows have had their best seasons behind them before 2015 and the new ones...just...kind of suck. The only real exceptions are Liv and Maddie, Best Friends Whenever and Girl Meets World, and the latter two only with a ton of qualifications and conditions attached. Best Friends Whenever is often good in spite of itself (a problem its predecessor, Dog With a Blog, as well as K.C. Undercover, Austin & Ally and Jessie also had), and Girl Meets World is just too inconsistent with its varying quality (and again, is prone to being good in spite of itself - Meets Hurricane, anyone?) Liv and Maddie is the only show that's not only good, not only consistently good, but also consistently good on actually worthy merits. In fact between the two networks as a whole I can really only say that about this show and 100 Things (even the Cinemat shows that I'm a big fan of are good in spite of themselves, as I had mentioned just above). And even then, this wasn't always the case of Liv and Maddie - but it certainly was the case for the show during the entirety of the 2015 calendar year and at least a good chunk of the second season trailing off from 2014.

I'm also going to just insert a snippet of a minor story here - Liv and Maddie specifically really helped me in a personal dark spot late in 2014 into early-mid 2015. That may have removed some objectivity, but so what, it's not like I'm a member of an actual, official commission assigning this. Besides, it seems to be a common sentiment enough, so, yeah, Liv and Maddie all the way.

Runners Up: Best Friends Whenever, Girl Meets World

These are the only other shows on Disney Channel that even can pretend to come close to being the best. Yes, BFW is dumb, and yeah maybe the acting is questionable but in such a way to be entertaining. It's a show about best friends that can time travel at will, and that will to time travel is rather random, so at least it doesn't pretend to try to be the next Girl Meets World or Liv and Maddie or Lizzie McGuire, and has fun in the process. 

And Girl Meets World is, well, Girl Meets World. There's a whole 'nuther blog entirely dedicated to that show if you really want to know more about it. 

Best New Show, Between the Networks: 100 Things Again

Yeah, if I didn't need to explain it a second time I don't need to a third.

Runners-Up: WITS Academy, Bella and the Bulldogs. Best Friends Whenever

WITS Academy is having the same shaky start that EWW had, but not to the same degree, and it managed to gel quite a bit sooner. Speaking of which, making the focal point Andi and her WITS trying to gel with each other has been a pretty interesting plot decision, and the cast pulls it off well.

Best New Show, Nickelodeon: Duh,it's going to be 100 Things (Runners-Up: WITS Academy, Bella and the Bulldogs)

Best New Show, Disney Channel: Best Friends Whenever

Runner-up is K.C. Undercover by default.

Worst Show Between the Networks: Bunk'd

This certainly has to be the disappointment of the year, though given what the last season of Jessie is like I guess I shouldn't be surprised. Debby Ryan really was the glue that held that show together, and now they've ripped that glue right out. Peyton List, so far, hasn't even been given an opportunity to see if she can pick up Debby's mantle. It's like she's the perpetual guest star of her own freakin' show. The problems are numerous, but much of what ails Peyton's ability to be the lead in her own show is the ridiculously large cast - between herself, carry-overs Skai and Karan, Miranda May, and whoever plays Xander, Jorge, Tiffany and an almost guaranteed appearance between Hazel and....I don't even remember what's her face so I'll just call her for what she is, Mrs. Benson (oh wait, I just remembered it's Gladys...yeah, Mrs. Benson) there's hardly any room for Peyton. That's anywhere from 7 to 8 players per episode. Jessie had only six front-credited actors, and let's face it, Kevin Chamberlain was really just a perpetual guest star who got to have intro credit privileges (not that they weren't deserved). The relatively large cast also didn't hurt Jessie because it was Jessie and Bertram's job to be around the kids anyway, so they were forced to share screen time and Debby was forced to be given focus by rank of seniority as nanny. Yes, Suite Life on Deck also had a large cast between Dylan, Cole, Brenda, Phill, Matthew and Debby again. Again, Phill was a glorified guest star with intro credit privileges (again, not that they aren't deserved) and Matthew was perpetually stuck as a "guest star" for the entire series run. And again, that's still only six players. Yes, they added Marcus in the middle of the second and third seasons. Other than that fact, do you remember Marcus? Do you remember the eigth(!) cast member they added (no I don't mean Arwin coming back)? Do you remember they even did that? And anyway, even then most fo the group pretty much interacted with each other and the show never lost focus that it was Dylan and Cole's show, not Matthew and Doc's show. Yes, Shake it Up had a large cast. They never lost focus that it was Bella and Zendaya's show, not The Roshon and Caroline Variety Half-Hour (as much as I'd watch that). As far as Bunk'd's concerned, the focus is too disparate and too busy being everywhere. Part of that is built into the show itself - as CITs we have to follow Emma and Ravi everywhere, which means focus gets split between them two - but we also have to follow umm whatever Miranda's character's name is again (I want to call her her LaM's character, Lacey), and Xander, and Zuri, and Jorge, and Tiffany. On Jessie, following Bertram and up to one other character were optional (in other words, they only needed to spend a few minutes on the show if necessary). On SLoD, following Woody, Mr. Moseby and even London and Bailey were optional. On SiU, following anybody not Rocky or CeCe were optional. On Bunk'd, we have to follow Emma, Zuri, Ravi, Whoever Miranda Plays, up to Xander at least and at least one of the other kids (between Jorge and Tiffany) because it's what the audience expects at this point, especially after they hyped up the stardom Zuri and Karan carry over now. 

But that's not even the show's biggest problem. The show's biggest problem is that the writing just flat-out sucks. It's delving immediately into what made SLoD Season 3 and Jessie Season 4 crap. To paraphrase Chuck Sonnenberg, who does his excellent Star Trek reviews at Sci-Fi Debris (erm, you can Google it) in the same vein as Christian and Sean for GMW and what we do here, it's like Star Trek: Voyager. They took Star Trek: The Next Generation and just continued it for an extra season with the same trends with a different name and cast. The last season of TNG was crap, and so was the last season of Jessie. Again, it shouldn't be a surprise Bunk'd carries that trend in hindsight.

If only Pamela Eells O'Connell, Tom Pollock and Jim Hodgson can write a character who isn't a one-note stereotype (yes I'm looking at both you Ravi and Jorge). 

Runners-Up: Game Shakers, I Didn't Do It

Worst Show of Disney Channel: Bunk'd (duh), Runners-Up: I Didn't Do It

IDDI gets this ignoble distinction mainly by default, but the second season did stink compared to the first. They took all the elements that made it watchable and turned it into an excrutiatingly bland, boring mess that was more suited as a cure to insomnia than a Disney Channel sitcom. It was, quite honestly, rightfully put out of its misery. All of its players really deserve better, especially Piper Curda (there, uh, may be some personal bias in that last one specifically).

Worst Show on Nickelodeon: Game Shakers

Again, Game Shakers is pretty much all the bad parts of iCarly and Victorious distilled into its own series

Runner-Up: None

This is the one area where Nickelodeon can claim to have a numerical edge on Disney Channel in 2015.

Best Original Movie: Splitting Adam

Like 100 Things, it manages to be very well-written and fun with a legitimate good story and - dare I say it - heart behind it. Obviously it's also Nick's best original movie too with Liar, Liar Vampire being the runner-up (I seem to be the only one in the world who liked it).

Best DCOM: Bad Hair Day

But only by default. Despite having no less than 4 DCOMs this year (compared to '13's record-low of just one) this was an extremely fallow year for DCOMs of actual quality. I'm tempted to qualify and name Pants on Fire as best DCOM by technicality because I legitimately enjoyed that much more than the original movies actual Disney Channel had to offer.

Runner-Up: Descendants

Again, strictly by default. That said, it's a pretty cynical attempt at a straight-line demo grab (as Gawker's iO9 notes): filled to the brim with shipping and story/plotlines that make little sense other than it's what tweens think is cool. And that's that movie in a nutshell. Sadly, it worked brilliantly.

Worst Nickelodeon Original Movie: Oh Boy Where Do I Even Begin (but seriously, either One Crazy Cruise or Genie in a Bikini, depending on how you define "original movie")

Nickelodeon sure pumped out a lot of "movies" this year. And by "movies" they mean exactly three, along with a bunch of one-hour specials that are clearly really show pilots that stink to high heaven. Genie in a Bikini is legitimately one of the worst things I've ever witnessed on either network (and that says a lot), or for that matter any network (or at least including other networks of this ilk like Cartoon Network - yes even during the live-action days). Joey Richter, WTF? Genie in a Bikini was so bad it's really one of those things you have to experience yourself to see how bad it is. It's this year's...whatever that thing was supposed to be, with the little girls that were on Ellen DeGeneres. You know what I mean (and if you don't, you need to consider yourselves lucky).

But as far as legitimate movies are concerned, yeah, One Crazy Cruise was pretty awful too. Kid networks really need to stop ripping off The Hangover. Not even actual Hangover sequels are liked, what made you think it translates to kids shows?It was...just...no. That script should've died during the brainstorming sesh.

Runners-Up: Pretty Much Everything Else

Worst DCOM: [Redacted]

I seem to be the only one who absolutely hated Invisible Sister. Even Mike liked it, somehow. But yeah. I just wasn't impressed. It had a muddled message that was undone by its own plot and premise. It went into basically whatever direction it felt like. Rowan's acting was dead-on for a Keanu Reeves 47 Ronin impression. That's not a personal attack against her, but it's just so bizarre and outright surreal that an actress who can act on que so adeptly on GMW has such wood plank-like passion that it actually went into uncanny valley territory. I don't care if you all disagree with me.

Runner-Up: Teen Beach 2

What makes TB2 touchy is that it legitimately has a good message - the whole women and STEM thing the latest GMW was about - but it's an afterthought, wrapped around a poorly-written, dead, listless and boring package that killed and betrayed everything the first movie was about. It was a complete dud of a movie, and audiences agreed as it was a complete ratings dud - don't expect a TB3. The only thing it had going for it was the Fallin' For Ya remix and the ending number, That's How We Do. Otherwise, it's the greatest implosion of a DCOM franchise in the history of DCOMs.

Worst Original Movie: One Crazy Cruise

It's hard for me to pick between this and Invisible Sister, but I figure this headline would be less upsetting.

Runners-Up: Teen Beach 2, All the other one-hour "junk" Nick had, umm, Invisible Sister

Best Individual Episode, Overall: Rate-a-Rooney (Liv and Maddie, Disney Channel)

If you've seen this episode, you know why it belongs here. This is what Girl Meets World is trying to be, encapsulated in a single episode.

Best Individual Episode, Nickelodeon: Nicky, Ricky, Dicky and Dawn Go Hollywood

Like many shows that end up being good, it doesn't forget how to be goofy yet successful. With a bevy of guest stars that would make even Liv and Maddie envious (Jack Griffo; Daniella Monet; Paris Smith, Autumn Wendell and Denesia Wilson of Every Witch Way; even Food Network's Alex Gurnichelli) it didn't waste any of them (ok, so many the EWW actresses were more of an Easter Egg, but it's better than what Bunk'd probably would do). This is exactly how you do a one-hour special for a goofy live-action tween or even pre-tween sitcom like this.

Runners-Up:  Haunted Family (The Haunted Hathaways), A Superhero is Born! (Thundermans), Meet The Evilmans (Thundermans), Son of Evilman (Thundermans),  Finish Line (WITS Academy), A Tale of Two Lives (Every Witch Way), Van Pelt Reunion (Every WItch Way)

Best Individual Episode, Disney Channel: Rate-a-Rooney (duh); Runners-Up: Detention-a-Rooney (Liv and Maddie), Gift-a-Rooney (Liv and Maddie), Flugelball-a-Rooney (Liv and Maddie), Girl Meets the New Teacher (Girl Meets World), Girl Meets Semi-Formal (Girl Meets World), Identity Thieves (Jessie), Dance Dance Resolution (Jessie), Karate Kid-Tastrophe (Jessie), The Puppies Talk! (Dog With a Blog), Guess Who's Dating Karl (Dog With a Blog), Runaway Robot (K.C. Undercover), A Time to Jump and Jam (Best Friends Whenever), Cyd and Shelby Strike Back (Best Friends Whenevr)

More or less each show got to put up at least one really good episode, even the ones that didn't have such a hot season this year. The Liv and Maddie episodes were all a good mixture of the seriousness and goofiness that make this show so great; Girl Meets World put up a few good solid episodes, with Semi-Formal perhaps being the best; DWaB had some hilarious episodes as did BFW; KCU's 1-hour special was pretty solid and delivered on the action the show promises; even Jessie got to have two or three episodes that were a solid return-to-form to what the show used to be (and having Phill Lewis as Mr. Moseby certainly helped). 

Worst Individual Episode, Disney Channel: Rossed at Sea Part 1 (Jessie)

All the problems of Jessie Season 4 encapsulated into a single episode. 

Runners-Up: Lindy and Logan Get Pshyced (I Didn't Do It), Girl Meets Gravity (Girl Meets World), The Neighborhood Watchdogs (K.C. Undercover), Nearly Any Given Episode of Bunk'd

Worst Individual Episode, Nickelodeon: Henry and the Woodpeckers (Henry Danger)

Snore

Runners-Up: Almost any given episode of Game Shakers

Best Finale, Nick and Overall: Every Witch Way

Pretty much by default, but at least it was action-packed, even if it did end in a cliffhangar designed to set up WITS Academy

Runner-Up: Dog With a Blog, Haunted Hathaways

Though not intended as such, at least HH's finale had emotional closure. That's more than what a certain show with 101 episodes, a clearly defined end-game and a very pretty redhead with a generous bust-size for a star can say.

Best Finale, Disney: Dog With a Blog

Again, by default. Yay, competition falling on its face!

Runner-Up: haha, nice joke!
Actually I just remembered that Phineas and Ferb ended in 2015. Phineas and Ferb, and yet it was so low-profile that I forgot it happened even though I saw it multiple times (pretty much every time they aired it). Yeah, needless to say motherfucking Phineas and Ferb gets the spot of Disney Channel's best series finale in 2015 with Dog With a Blog being the only real legitimate runner-up. I suppose P&F also takes the best finale spot overall away from EWW, though (and as good as P&F's was) I still maintain it was pretty close (yes I like EWW that much).

Worst Finale, Disney and Overall: Jessie

Yeah. Where to start. Just read our review of Oray for Ollywood. They might as well have shoved a pie in Debby's face as she was making her exit from the studio lot.

Other than EWW and HH I don't think any Nick show has had a series finale in 2015 (at least officially)

Runner-Up: I Didn't Do It

Yay, non-finale due to premature cancellation!

Greatest Improvement: Liv and Maddie

In the second season Liv and Maddie went from a show that can be best described as meh and was sometimes just outright bad to one of the greatest in the history of either network. Everything just meshed and came together as John D. Beck and Ron Hart pulled out all the stops and pushed their own talents, with the cast doing the same. They got A-game guest stars, and had them coming back. Many of them had recognizable names (at least for the network), many didn't, but they were all great. The secondary characters were A-game as well, from Johnny Nimbus to Dump Truck; Holden Dippledorf to Andie, uh, I forgot what her last name is supposed to be (Esposito?) Forget about Liv and Maddie being a case study on how to improve a show, it's a case study on how to make a great tween/teen/family show period.

Runners-Up: Girl Meets World, Henry Danger, Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn, Talia in the Kitchen, to a lesser extent Bella and the Bulldogs

Greatest Fall On Its Face: Three-Way Tie Between Jessie, Teen Beach 2 and I Didn't Do It

I tried to pick just one, and I can't: these are three such specatular failures that they each need to be studied. Regarding Jessie, it seems like absolutely everyone, including the actress who plays the lead character whose name is the same as the show itself, just quit and gave up and completely lost interest as soon as the new season and new year began. It was a 20-episode long string of going through the motions. Even the finale just went through the motions, getting Jessie to Hollywood in order to say, see, we have an end game!, and it was a 30 minute insult to the fandom that made Debby and Pamela the reigning queen and woman-behind-the-scenes of the entire tween television entertainment scene since 2012 when iCarly came to an end, and even before that for Disney Channel itself after Wizards of Waverly Place called it quits. Even Debby herself became ashamed of the show - no, really, it was pretty much Miley-style. Go Google it if ou don't believe me. 

As for TB2 and IDDI, it's a great case study on how to dismantle from the inside a movie and TV franchise, respectively. Nice going, Phil Baker. Nice going, TB2 writing staff (different from the first movie - Obvious Mistake #1). 

Runner-Up: Bunk'd

Technically it's hard to fall on your face if you started lying on your stomach in the first place, but Bunk'd counts since the magic ratings success carried over from Jessie never happened. 

Best Gimmick: Disney Channel's Monstober Crossover

In addition to the obligatory holiday theme, there was some interesting interaction across some shows, plus I guess that contest was a thing.

Runners-Up: Disney Channel's Sounds of Summer Musical Guests, Radio Disney Christmas, Lab Rats vs. Mighty Med, Nickelodeon's Worldwide Day of Play (I need to reach to put Nick on this list)

Worst Gimmick: Disney Channel's Monstober Crossover

On the other hand, the success of Monstober was very show-specific. Some shows, like Liv and Maddie and even Best Friends Whenever, integrated it well. Others, like I Didn't Do It and Austin & Ally, squandered it and treated it like something that was forced upon them (granted, it was, but...)

Runners-Up: That Mystery Thing Nickelodeon Did, Nickelodeon's Ho-Ho-Holidays Special

Greatest Success Story, Disney Channel: Descendants

Yeah, this was far and away Disney Channel's greatest success in 2015, just going by the pure numbers. As much as TB2 fell flat on its face, Disney has a new TV movie franchise waiting in the wings anyway. Proper DCOM ratings, a huge fanbase and endless merchandizing.

Runners-Up: Descendants: Wicked World, Star Wars: Rebels, Girl Meets World, Liv and Maddie, Lab Rats vs. Mighty Med

Greatest Success Story, Nickelodeon: Alvinn! And the Chipmunks

You can also call this 2015's biggest surprise. Nobody expected this French co-production based on what many people thought was a dead franchise walking to be Nickelodeon's biggest success of the year, and one of the most watched programming of the entire network. A combination of things ended up making this a winner.

Runners-Up: Every Witch Way, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Nickelodeon just got hammered in 2015 and it shows.

Greatest Failure, Disney Channel: Teen Beach 2

Teen Beach 2 kind of sucks, and it shows. The ratings are just disappointing enough to guarantee this franchise dead. For what Disney Channel hoped would be the next High School Musical (and for a while looking like they hit paydirt), and with Descendants looking like a more likely successor, TB2 has to be considered the network's greatest disappointment by the raw numbers.

Runners-Up: Bunk'd, Jessie Season 4, I Didn't Do It

It's obvious Bunk'd was supposed to pull in the same tentpole numbers as GMW and LaM, not struggling to get more than Nickelodeon's daily "strips" and telenovas. Jessie's fall from grace, struggling to get to 2 million compared to routinely getting close to or surpassing 4 million in 2013 and the first half of 2014 is pretty bad, but at least it was a lame duck. I Didn't Do It got a crew change to help right the ship, and consequently swiftly capsized. 

Greatest Falure, Nickelodeon: 100 Things To Do Before High School

Again, just talking raw numbers. As I've said this is my favorite show of both networks right now but practically nobody seems to be watching. Meanwhile, haphazard messes and cynical demo-grabs like Descendants are doing gangbusters.

Runners-Up: Pig Goat Bananna Cricket, Bell and the Bulldogs, WITS Academy, Talia in the Kitchen

Again, most if not all of these shows are actually pretty good in quality - even if not especially PGBC which is my idea of a cartoon that can be enjoyed by older audiences. Again, nobody's watching. But that tends to apply to the network as a whole.

I find it hilarious how you said that 100 Things is the best show on both networks, but when it came down to best individual episodes, ain't no love in the heart of the city. :)

I'm not really qualified to speak on Disney Channel because I spent the better half of 2015 pretending it did not exist outside of Girl Meets World, so I'll just go with Nickelodeon and see what I can come up with. 

Best Live-Action Series: The Thundermans

Have I mentioned this before? Yeah, I probably have, but The Thundermans just has this charming quality that keeps me coming back. Maybe it's the chemistry between Kira Kosarin and Jack Griffo. Maybe it's Dr. Colosso's role as comic relief that he excels in. Maybe it's the fact that they do the superhero thing a lot better than Henry Danger does so it never feels like a joke. But yeah, this is one entertaining show. I feel like it has improved greatly since season one, or at least maintained a consistent quality. Nickelodeon should have played its cards right with this series, because if they had, it would be a lot bigger. Not Hannah Montana big, obviously, but this show is currently in its third season and I have no idea how big the fanbase was. Does anybody even talk about this show online?

Honorable Mentions: Bella and the Bulldogs, 100 Things to Do Before High School

Best Animated Series: Allllllvin! and the Chipmunks

When I first heard about this show, I legitimately thought it was going to be on Nick Jr. The animation was the sole reason for that and it made me wonder why this was even being attempted. But I ended up being pleasantly surprised. On a network that can barely promote shows well enough and seems to be strapped for ideas, this show is a breath of fresh air. The voice acting is always entertaining, the characters are endearing, the jokes have this nuance that reminds me of early SpongeBob, and the music is always a pleasure to listen to as well. I'm still not crazy about the animation, but this show rises above that and manages to satisfy all my needs as a fan of kids shows. Between this and TMNT, Nickelodeon at least knows how to resurrect old franchises.

Honorable Mentions: Harvey Beaks (before Alvin came, man.........), SpongeBob SquarePants

Worst Live-Action Series: Game Shakers
You probably knew this was coming. This show is a reminder of the fact that Dan Schneider needs some rest and he should really stop working on two shows at once. Nothing about this series works except for Kel Mitchell, and that's only because he is tailor-made for Schneider comedy. There are some actors and actresses that are just skilled at making his deliberately awkward and hammy material work. Him, Josh Peck, Miranda Cosgrove, Matt Bennett......you know the rest. I also like Benjamin Flores, Jr. and wish him the best, but I don't care about Babe or Kenzie. Hudson is the stupidest character that Dan Schneider has ever created. How that is even possible when we saw what happened to Cat Valentine is beyond me, but he solely exists for the purpose of being stupid. The pilot turned me off completely from watching more episodes, but I actually liked the Christmas one......because of Kel. Without him, this show would be absolutely irredeemable. It's not built to last and should have never been greenlit.

Dishonorable Mentions: Every Witch Way, Henry Danger, Nicky, Ricky, Dicky, & Dawn (I feel like I don't get this show's reason for existing. Can someone please help me?)

Worst Animated Series: Pig Goat Banana Cricket
Horrible, horrible animation, these characters all make me want to hurt myself, bizarre plotting, horrible theme song, just a horrible way to spend your time. Did I mention that this show makes me want to hurt myself?

Dishonorable Mentions: The Fairly OddParents (this show's decline has been absolutely painful), Breadwinners

Best Business Decision by the Network: Creation of The Splat
The 90s Are All That was getting pretty stale and this was a wise move to rebrand it. From what I have seen, The Splat has a lot more variety than the last block and seems to carry a freshness that The 90s Are All That was lacking. Even The Adventures of Pete & Pete came to the airwaves for the first time in years. I think I know why people love that show. Still, no Secret World of Alex Mack? Why does The Splat want to keep me away from Larisa Oleynik? When the show comes to The Splat, somebody let me know.

Hi it's me again. Went back and cleaned up some of the formatting mess for starters (Blogspot is handy enough if you're doing a run-of-the-mill blog but otherwise it's pretty limited, as I've stated before in the past). Not a lot to add except I still find it interesting where Mike and I disagreed.

For starters I really do seem to be the lone EWW fan here (or just about anywhere). I really don't know if it's worth really getting into a debate over because it really does end up being an acquired taste. It has charms that work for some people, and not really much for most. I could go on but I can save that for a separate entry. 

What's much more interesting is Pig Goat Banana Cricket. Unlike EWW, which is essentially a foreign-language crew being tasked with creating a telenovella comedy for the English-language market, PGBC is much more in-line with Nickelodeon's "traditional" style of animation. It's a very specific style that Cartoon Network has adopted or imitated off and on (most successfully with Regular Show, though I suppose you can make the case that Adventure Time! and Steven Universe are also Nick-ish style shows) and that especially Disney XD has been making a straight line for in its animation. It's a style of animation that's been with Nickelodeon since Ren and Stimpy, just because if nothing else Ren and Stimpy was so game-changing - you can't exactly say there hadn't been anything like it before, but animation of this nature that was "kid-friendly," not so much - that it really became a signature for the entire network. By animation "style" I don't mean just the art aesthetic (though that's certainly a major component) but the overall look, feel and plotting of the show, down to if not especially the mixture of gross-out humor and randomness. 

Anyway, I like it. Probably because I'm simple-minded enough - I do like Jessie after all. I'd love to see if Mike would be willing to do a post where we just debate the merits of PGBC some time. Like EWW it's not everybody's cup of tea and it just boils down to does the randomness work or not. Based on the ratings, it seems to work for few.

Harvey Beaks is...hmmm. It's from C.H. Greenblatt, the creator of the under-appreciated Chowder which was a brilliant cartoon in '08 (wow I'm old). I'll give it credit, it's certainly a gorgeous cartoon from just an aesthetic perspective - maybe even bizarrely so. C.H. Greenblatt is especially good for that kind of thing. And the main eponymous character is certainly charming enough. I just think those are the biggest things it has going for it. I saw the first few episodes from its premiere and I was admittedly underwhelmed. I saw today's (1/15's) new episode and it was...decent. PGBC is loud and obnoxious by comparison, but in a way that's so stupid I can't help but laugh.

But then there's Alvinn! And the Chipmunks - it came right out of nowhere and it's owning the network, for pretty much the reasons Mike said. 

Also, yeah, Game Shakers really does suck.

Oh, and as for nominees for 100 Things for best episode of the network - I really liked the one with Garrett Clayton in it. 

Girl Meets World Reviewed: Girl Meets STEM

I'm going to make a volcano that will turn into a robot and crush all the other volcanos!

Riley, I hate to break it to you, but that thing called science? It's not exactly something that's your forte. It hits hard, Riley, then because you're a girl, you'll inevitably screw it up for everyone around you. Your best friend did it, your own parents most likely did it. Break the cycle, Riley. Rise above. Focus on Lucas.

What is it? You know, Girl Meets World. You should know all this already by now.

Not to intrude on what Mike's been doing or preempt him, but I do want to add some thoughts to STEM before it actually airs, just based on the previews. Basically, it looks like Farkle's going to be the Designated Bad Guy(TM) in this one. I know it can seem like men just want to dominate over women because they think women are inferior, but I'm willing to bet Farkle, well, probably thinks he's just superior to everybody when it comes to science experiments. It's practically the only thing he's confident at (or at least until Donnie Barnes took over). Not that such overconfidence (or badly distributed confidence - trust me feeling better than everyone when it comes to middle school-level science experiments and feeling like you suck at literally everything else isn't great life balance) couldn't stand to be broken either. But, uh, I guess we'll see.

Also, Alvinnn! And the Chipmunks did a better STEM episode. If for nothing else because it brought us that badass quote above (seriously, if you're going to make a volcano like everyone else, you want to at least make sure your volcano can take out all the competition through copious amounts of destructive, futuristic violence). 

It's okay, Unknown. I haven't been working on anything lately but it's been really slow for kids TV. And yes, another Alvinnn! fan in the house! I don't think I've seen that one yet, I have to check it out.

I actually am quite pleased you brought this episode's promos up because it looks like we're all going to hell on Friday. I don't want to be presumptuous, but based solely off of the previews, this is shaping up to be the worst episode of the show since "Gravity." Simply because, and only because, Riley is absolutely intolerable. All Farkle asked her to do was drop the stupid marble into the solution. Maybe he came off as a little arrogant, but we all know that science is Farkle's game. It's where he excels and I know for a fact that Riley is nowhere near his level. If this episode is going to be about Riley simply standing up for herself because she believes she is just as good at science as Farkle, then it will be a good episode. I mean, the boy should realize that some people are going to excel at the same things he does. 

But nope, it......doesn't look like they're going that route. They're making this a male vs. female thing, and I'm kinda tired of seeing that plot on television because almost every show deals with gender relations in the exact same way. Females prove they have what it takes, males give them their props, blah blah blah. I really don't want to sound like I'm trashing this episode before it comes out, but I honestly believe Riley would turn this into a gender thing while having absolutely no clue of what to do with the actual experiment. It's a really in-character action, and the odd thing about it is that at the same time, it didn't feel like Riley in that promo. It felt like Rowan Blanchard playing herself, and I don't want this episode to turn into one big mission statement with a lesson that is bashed into your head several times over. 

Also, that Maya thing, cheesy Yogi.........does anybody want to make heads or tails of that? That's going to be some quality television, let me tell you. I think it would be absolutely hilarious if Maya took in some bad fumes from the chemicals and just acted like how she did in the promo for the whole episode. Maya on a drug-induced trip, I would pay to watch that episode.

Well, we still have more than two days left but in all honesty, I'm not looking forward to this one at all. 

I was a big fan of the 1980s-early 90s series of The Chipmunks (the "original" as far as the Chippettes are concerned, invented specifically for that iteration of the Chipmunks) so of course I needed to check out the revival, especially since it carries that series' theme song almost unaltered (they just shortened it to a few verses). It was one of the first television series I've ever watched, and the first one I distinctly remember really liking. The new one...more or less keeps up the same spirit (much more successfully than Cartoon Network's similar revival of Garfield and Friends in the CGI Garfield cartoon) but like the new Garfield it looses a lot of translation making the jump to CGI (a sad necessity in today's world just for budget reasons if nothing else). Still, there's a deserved reason why it's hanging with Spongebob as one of the highest rated things on the network right now. But I guess that's another time. Also, man I'm old.

In the interest of being really, really lazy I'm just going to copy-paste what I wrote on Christian and Sean's blog (minus where I tease Sean over Sarah Carpenter and comparing it to me and Debby Ryan P.S. I haven't seen the episode yet):

I haven't seen the episode yet so all I know of is what's gone on in this very review. Getting people, especially girls, interested in science is very problematic in education, and it's a double-edged sword in the fact that there's real pressure from higher-up and from parents to get girls especially, but literally everyone, interested in STEM subjects, including and up to just about forcing them (or whatever passes as such, as much as you can). When you get down to it it's just no different than what school has always been, except it got inevitably politicized due to a combination of fears that women are being squeezed out of STEM subjects in school (as I just said, it's always been the attitude of education to get everybody interested in everything, at least to my experience - I don't remember anti-female STEM discrimination at all, both as a student and then as a teacher myself) and the fear that the U.S. keeps taking massive steps backwards in comparison to the rest of the world when it comes to the STEM fields (which are critical for financial infrastructure, communication and - let's face it, defense, which is the real reason why certain politicians with major military-industrial complex ties and keep using China and Japan as platform points keep pushing for STEM competitiveness). The end effect is to exaggerate an existing problem - "education" and "STEM" gaps start being fabricated and administration and politicians miss whether or not the problem might be teaching methods (research and experience shows that the good old fashioned science lab experience and participation is highly effective at raising scientific understanding and interest, but it's also expensive) but instead either blame students, teachers or both, and then attempt awkward solutions towards overcoming that blame.

That said...eh, again, just based on your description of the episode, while Mr. (or Mrs.? I really need to actually watch this) Norton's methods might be...odd in real-life context, I guess it does deliver a point. 

These writers really need to be able to deliver points more effectively.

I was able to watch the episode live which was difficult because for some reason, whenever I try watching GMW live, something or somebody has to interrupt me. Virtually every single time I watch a new episode of the show when it first airs, that has to happen. I have no idea why.

It could have been a lot, lot worse. They didn't repeatedly pound the lesson into you, Riley was a lot more tolerable than I thought she would be, and it was interesting having them learn their lesson in a way that doesn't involve history. The only problem is it feels like the plot didn't naturally fit the characters. It's like they had to have all the boys in the class do the science while the girls drop the marble in order to make the point they were going for. Christian & Sean summed it up nicely when they said that the teams for the assignment were not chosen correctly. Farkle would never, ever, make Riley drop the marble simply because she's a girl. Maya barely cared about anything that was happening because of her laziness, and then we had that unfunny non-sequitur crap where the girls were going to sacrifice Yogi and Maya was acting like she had become addicted to smack. The odd part about that is at the same time, it was mixed in with Farkle and Riley's serious confrontation about the experiment. There was no reason to do that and it feels like I lost the point completely.

The writers walked into a brick wall with this one when Farkle realized that he was preventing Riley from realizing her scientific potential,.....during the second act. And no, I don't even care that Riley's interest in science has never been brought up before because they at least took it seriously. Plus, it was implied that because of Farkle, Riley really never felt the need to challenge herself, deciding to wander in the shadow of someone she long believed to be better than her. Once Farkle told her to drop the marble, Riley resigned from that mindset because she felt disrespected and wanted her friend to see that she had an interest in science as well. Just a thought. Anyway, Farkle obviously is not a sexist pig like Riley claims he is, just a perfectionist who wanted to do well on another report. That was an unnecessary, uncharacteristic comment from her but that's as far as they went with trying to push the sexism angle. Between that and the science teacher saying that nobody has ever figured out his assignment in almost 40 years.......it felt too easy. This episode almost had no reason to exist. It just emphasized what we already knew about each and every one of these characters. Remembering to never lose focus and strive for more is a very important lesson to take from this episode. If it was said in a more coherent way, it could have been a fantastic episode. Instead, it just ends up being a bit underwhelming. They saved it from pushing the sexism angle, but I feel like this issue is a little too complex for GMW to handle it properly. Then again, I can say that for a lot of episodes like this. 

So, the best thing I can say about this episode is it was not as bad as it could have been? Eh, I guess so. I don't want it to sound like I hate this episode, but it just came off as undercooked to me. Like, they had some great ideas, but it wasn't translated well enough. 

Episode Grade: C+

MVP: Sabrina Carpenter. I just loved how over Maya was with everything in this episode, especially when Lucas was telling her to drop the marble and she couldn't even do that. Seriously, episodes like this make me realize that Maya could shine in a comedic role just as well as a dramatic role. 

QUICK BITS

-Topanga's attitude towards Auggie being proud of himself over his poor soccer performance was hilarious. Reminded me of old-school competitive Topanga. It's very weird how that subplot literally only lasted that one scene unless I'm missing something. Isn't that strange to you guys?

-They really need to stop bringing in Zay every few episodes. I feel like he could be a great character and provide some nice comedy because I like him whenever he's on screen, but it feels like the writers aren't committed to him right now. Either make him a cast member or get rid of him entirely, he doesn't get that Shawn treatment.

-I could get behind assertive Sarah. She's so cute, you just want to wrap her into a present and take her home. By the way, is it me, or do I just not see the resemblance between her and Sabrina Carpenter? And how weird is that Sabrina is younger than her? What kind of girls do they get for these roles? 

-Cheesy Yogi? Seriously? I'm really pissed that they let that scene go by without rewriting it. Riley and Farkle were having a serious moment that I was into and then they hit us with that left field sacrificing BS.

-This episode almost confirms my belief that Riley and Farkle are going to end the series together. The chemistry that Rowan and Corey have is just phenomenal and they play off of each other so effortlessly. Kinda like how Sabrina and Peyton have great chemistry but they are never allowed to show it in the setting of a relationship for some reason. Shame, shame, shame.

-The next episode looks pretty interesting, but I feel like some other Disney Channel show has done that plot before. I don't know, I think the show had a stupid sea school in it. Also, I hope Mark Cuban's guest appearance isn't as awkward as Perez Hilton's was. 

Here I go again, swooping in several weeks after the fact! (well, one and a half)

I've finally seen the episode. And I think it's...

...ummm...wow.

I'm being completely serious when I say I think it's the best episode the show has had so far. I'm completely serious. If this episode aired back in December I might've named it the best episode of any show on Disney Channel in 2015. 

Of course, I'm a student teacher so I'm a bit biased here. One of the greatest struggles a teacher has is to try to figure out how to get all of his or her students interested in the subject that teacher teaches, because, well, that's what that teacher is quite literally paid to do. Unfortunately it also creates a bit of a mess. One of the things teachers hate admitting is that each of the core subjects end up competing against each other whether intentional or not - and in more ways than one. Teachers compete with each other over students - English teachers compete with Science teachers over homework time and interest. Teachers are also competing with each other when it comes to raw dollars - because of all these news reports about how the U.S. is lagging behind Japan, Korea and China in the STEM fields, and because these same news reports link STEM with manufacturing, and because these same news reports then go on to link manufacturing with raw cold hard economics and GDP (i.e. cash) production, people panic and start complaining to their local politicians about why we're losing our ground on manufacturing, and why our economy sucks, and it's because the way we teach STEM sucks, and that if we fall too far behind the Chinese Commies are going to become our new supreme overlords who will not only dominate the global economy but can also literally nuke any dissent flat with their vastly superior military, also made possible through their STEM superiority.

Of course, the actual educational picture is much more complex than that. But both politicians and the public that votes for them hate complex. They like it when they can boil down everything to some sort of either literal or conceptual boogeyman, and education's failure to properly raise an educated corps well versed in STEM fields gets to be an educational boogeyman for politicians.

The end result is that subjects like arts, physical education and even literature and language arts fields suffer because they only serve to detract from STEM fields, because last time a politician and his or her aids checked, learning about the arts or literature in middle or high school isn't going to let us build better and more powerful nukes than what the ChiComs can build, or smarter and more powerful conventional bombs and missile than what the ChiComs can build, or have our factories spit out whatever it is that raises GDP (cars, refrigerators, computers, oil production equipment, nuke-tipped missiles, what have you) faster than what the ChiComs can. 

Again, it's much more complex than that. But there is a general sentiment in the air that many people, particularly politicians, are looking at the raw on-paper stats and pissing their pants in immediate reaction before they even understand what those raw on-paper stats mean.

Anyway, that's a long-winded way of saying that STEM is important, and having students interested in STEM is important, even if only because it's literally being forced upon you upon threat of losing your job at the expense of other still very important educational subjects, and then only because it boils down to people being afraid of economic domination or outright being literally blown away and killed by the superior military of a foreign threat that chances are doesn't even exist. But enough politicizing, on to the actual episode.

The reason why I liked this episode so much is, quite frankly, I thought Mr. Norton's approach is brilliant. I legitimately think it is important to have young students - especially girls - realize that they can make important contributions to science, and that those contributions extend to even the little lab experiments they do in a classroom environment. And that the classroom is absolutely an appropriate place to conduct social experients. But before we go on, we need to clarify what a social experiment even is.

When I say social experiment, I mean a literal experiment, no different than, say, dropping a "marble" (yeah a clod of dirt is so not a marble) into a beaker of water to see what happens. In other words, a very specific and deliberate set of conditions meant to demonstrate or expose a hypothesis. Also, there's a right way, and a very, very wrong way to conduct a social experiment as a matter of course of friggin' school. You've probably had innumerable social experiments conducted upon yourself through the course of school without even realizing it, and chances are those were conducted the right way. People come away with no hard feelings against each other, or even a newfound respect for another person, and people walk away happier. People walking away happier is the whole point of conducting social experiments in the classroom. It's to have students feel better about themselves and about the people they interact and work with - the same people that in the future will be their co-workers, their spouses and their extended and literal families. 

And then there's just doing it all sorts of wrong. Once upon a time in the 70s there was a social studies teacher who, well, let's say he thought he could be a Feeny or a Cory Matthews before there even was a Feeny or a Cory Matthews. And let's just say he was a lot closer to being Cory Matthews than being a Feeny. Through an arbitrary selection process he divided the students up into two groups, and had them physically separated. Class would go about normally, and for a while nothing happened - it's just that for some bizarre reason now the room was obviously and awkwardly divided. Except through the course of the experiment this teacher started implanting various thought seeds into these students' heads - the other side isn't as good as you guys in homework, the other side is jealous of you because you have better-looking boyfriends or girlfriends, or are better at sports, or you guys just smell better. Stuff like that. If you couldn't already tell where this was going, eventually he basically created two groups of opposing Nazis and the experiment turned into one of the worst clusterfucks in the entire history of American education. It got so bad it was turned into a movie, The Wave which was also turned into a book.

So yeah, while Mr. Norton's experiment was well-intended, dividing the boys and girls to essentially be against each other ended up being a bit too close to The Wave to qualify as a success, even if it wasn't even his intention at all. All he wanted to do was just show that the girls tended to want to just be the marble-dropper. Not rise up to be Chick HItlers. 

Speaking of which, Yogi seemed waaaay too enthusiastic to be sacrificed. That, and the exchange between him and Darby...I'm not convinced they have a healthy relationship. Someone might want to intervene in that.

In conclusion, I think I can see what the writers were going for past what was actually put on the screen. Seeing the trees for the forest, maybe (I'm not going to lie I don't get that saying and I think it's stupid). But that doesn't take away that these writers really need to take a hard look at what they're actually doing and figure out that what automatically translates into their heads isn't what 2 million viewers see (as opposed to a year and a half ago when it used to be over 3 million). 

Episode Grave: I'm torn between giving it anywhere from a B+ up to even an A+, and given all the facts - how much I liked it, but also how much Mr. Norton fundamentally fucked up when dealing with frickin' middle school students and people's reactions - I'm going to do something I swore never to do and just leave it up in the air outside of that vague range. Sorry to do this to you. There are things that make it really, really great, but there are things that make it dangerously questionable. Everybody acted terriffically, especially Rowan, Sabrina and kid-Corey-with-an-e, but it was in the name of a well-intended but muddled message.
Episode MVP: I'm tempted to say Sarah Carpenter because I think I might be catching whatever's got Sean over at Girl Meets World Reviewed. But I'll have to ultimately go with her sister for exactly what Mike said.

Oh, and a few other things I forgot

 - yeah, the subplot. While I also liked it (yay for Ava getting a few good scenes for a change!) it's a bit bizarre that Topanga of all people would be so happy with Auggie basically playing soccer by not playing soccer and getting an award for it. With actual pro athletes and even car commercials poking fun at it, the whole concept of "participation" awards has pretty much gone the way of the dodo. The people who had advocated for them have finally learned that 1.) the recipients of such rewards eventually regard them as meaningless 2.) despite anticipating the exact opposite and being hailed as heroes parents have basically yelled at them for "wussying" their kids and 3.) well, nobody just takes them seriously, which pretty much defeats the point. 

 - again, yay for Ava! (both Morgenstern, and Koker, the actual actress). Both of them have really grown now, especially compared to their usual appearances, and Koker strikes me as maybe being the rare child actress who can go the distance into adulthood, maybe.

 - and yeah, Mike, if the plot seems familiar to you it's because they also did it on an early episode of I Didn't Do It (back when the show was good-ish). 

All the shows that left Nickelodeon since iCarly

I mentioned in the previous post that from the period of late 2012 to, well, the present, Nickelodeon's pretty much hemorrhaged live-action programming. I promised a more detailed look at that, so, well, might as well get it over with. A lot of this is off the top of my head - I can go back and try to verify it on IMDb but, sadly, there isn't a lot to look up in terms of the sheer number of shows that ended unless you already know first-hand what to look for. So I'll try to make this comprehensive, and I'll go back and make changes accordingly, but bear with me and feel free to make corrections yourself in the comments. Anyway, I'm going to be organizing it by both year and success (whether or not the show lasted at least three seasons or not, which is more or less the Nick/Disney agreed upon marker of "success"). I'm not going to include the Saturday morning run of shows, or the animated block (I can keep track of that stuff if I really wanted to, but it's a bit complicated for my tastes) but the type of programming that tends to appeal to the type of demo Disney Channel is directly vying for (as opposed to what might be watching Disney Junior or XD instead) with maybe a few borderline cases but eh whatever. Beyond that everything is included, even foreign imports (virtually all of them were co-produced by Nick at home anyway). Again, I'm not tracking episode counts or total seasons, just strictly end-dates. 

Shows That Had Successful Runs:

2012: iCarly
2013: VicTORious, Big Time Rush
2014: Korra: The Last Airbender
2015: Every Witch Way, See Dad Run, Instant Mom

...wait that's seriously it? Oh wow. And two of those are Nick@Nite originals. Let's see the shows that have failed (again, less than three seasons, and in a lot of cases just one)

2012: Bucket and Skinner's Epic Adventure, How to Rock
2013: Marvin, Marvin; Wendell and Vinnie; House of Anubis; Supa Ninjas (a borderline case but it just didn't last enough by episode count)
2014: Sam & Cat (that's the only one I can think of for that year, but I still feel like I'm missing one)
2015: The Haunted Hathaways

Yeah, needless to say even when adding in Nick@Nite shows the number of failed shows outnumber the number of "successful" shows. Nick should consider itself lucky that 2014 and 2015 have only seen two official subpar cancelations total.

But not so far: WITS Academy and especially Talia in the Kitchen and 100 Things to Do Before High School and even Bella and the Bulldogs have questionable futures and possibly either have already aired their last episodes or will in 2016. It's possible Thundermans will air its last episode in 2016 too. That's no less than six shows whose fates are in the wind. Almost inevitably Make it Pop! will join them as well (daily strips are getting murdered since EWW made its exit). To put it another way, that's Nickelodeon's entire weekday/weekend afternoon live-action lineup sans Schneider's Bakery's productions. And then there's Max & Shred - I don't know what the status of this show is, but since this show has been utterly buried and completely hidden in the schedule over the summer and hasn't returned since, I think it's safe to assume it's canceled. I'm not completely sure so I'll just list it separately.

So, to summarize, since 2012 on Nickelodeon:
7 shows have ended successful runs
3 managed to end with four seasons specifically (though EWW is somewhat of an abberation by design)
8 shows have been prematurely canceled
15 shows have ended period regardless of success or circumstance
1 show that may or may not have been canceled, but most likely has been canceled
5 shows that are "on the bubble" and in imminent danger of being canceled
1 show that will most likely join them but is waiting to premiere its second season (Make it Pop!)

15 shows is a lot in three years, especially for a network like Nickelodeon. Especially given the number of premature cancelations they've had (just over half of their total expired shows!).

Just for fun, let's run the exact same statistics for Disney Channel. Again, this will be since 2012, for shows that have had "successful" runs (same exact criteria, at least three seasons or ran the entirety of its intended and planned run, which is an important distinction for one show on the list):

2012: Wizards of Waverly Place (we're not going to count Alex vs. Alex for this purpose)
2013: oddly enough, none!
2014: Good Luck Charlie, Fish Hooks, ANT Farm
2015: Phineas and Ferb (for this purpose we'll count it as a Disney Channel show), Dog With a Blog, Jessie
(January) 2016: Austin & Ally, Gravity Falls (I'm counting it as a Disney Channel show too since it premiered on that network)

Now let's run premature cancelations (again, less than three seasons)

2012: None! (WoWP was the only show in 2012 to come to an end)
2013: ...again, oddly enough, none! (no Disney Channel show aired series finales at all in 2013)
2014: ...and yet again, none! (all the Disney Channel shows that ended in 2014 ended with at least three seasons)
2015: I Didn't Do It (the only Disney Channel show that belongs on this list period since So Random! in 2011, which just misses out on this list).

So that's 9 successful shows that have come to an end in three years, and one that wasn't so successful. There are a number of shows with flailing ratings - actually pretty much all of them that aren't Girl Meets World or K.C. Undercover. Yes that even includes Bunk'd, which the network pretty much assumed was going to be a major, automatic four-season success. Really, the situation on Disney Channel and across both networks is such a mess I don't feel like I can put any shows on Disney Channel on "the bubble" as it's hard to tell right now if the network's going to sink them all for new programming or just swim anyway - other than Best Friends Whenever, which I've heard enough ratings and BTS woes to feel like I'll have to do so (as much as I actually like it). Which brings us to, since 2012:

9 shows that have had successful runs and have come to an end
5 shows (WoWP, GLC, Phineas and Ferb, Jessie and A&A) ended with a minimum of 100 episodes
Just 1 show that has come to a premature cancelation
10 shows total that have ended
Just one that's on the bubble, but more potential depending on exec's attitudes.

Disney Channel's 10 compared to Nickelodeon's 15. 15. I believe that stat speaks for itself. And of that 10 only one failed to make it three seasons (excepting Gravity Falls as it still ran its intended run), while over half of Nickelodeon's shows ended as failures. Just over half of Disney Channel's shows that have come to an end during that period managed to make out at least 100 episodes! Not all of Nickelodeon's shows that made it to four seasons even made that! (namely, again, EWW, though I don't remember if Korra or even BTR managed to quite make it to 100). Oh, and I keep forgetting that VicTORious had "four seasons" although by production code Season 4 is still Season 3, and it didn't quite even make it to 65 episodes which is the typical episode count with three seasons - so it's gone three seasons as far as I'm concerned, for whatever this compilation of statistics is worth.

I could run through some bad math to punch out some percentages for further on-paper pissing match comparisons, but the disreprency between all the numbers is big enough to make the conclusions obvious just as they are. If either having the fewest shows get canceled or the most shows get three (or four) seasons or more is sign of victory, then Disney Channel has utterly dominated Nickelodeon during the past three years and especially in 2013, which again going by this criteria was both Disney Channel's zenith and Nickelodeon's nadir (and again, this doesn't count Nick's Saturday/Sunday morning line-up, or most of their animated shows like Spongebob or Sanjay and Craig which I'm basically categorizing into a separate subnetwork more competing with Disney Junior or Disney XD depending on the show - and even so, the statistics are still favoring the Disney networks, though the stats aren't quite as lopsided in their favor. I suppose it's more akin to when Robb Stark was just running all over the Lannisters in his early battles, as opposed to late in Season 5 when the Whitewalkers were completely killing absolutely everything in their way and Jon Snow and Tormund barely escaped with their lives). 

Now, again just for fun, let's see the opposite effect - how many new TV shows each network has added in during the same period (keeping in mind that period is large enough that many of these shows have since ended and show up on the previous list) Also, again, it might be an incomplete list - to find out what shows premiered you kind of have to already know what you're looking for, but I'll try to make it as comprehensive and accurate as I can.

For new shows Nickelodeon added since 2012:

2012: Bucket and Skinner's Epic Adventure; How to Rock; Marvin, Marvin; The Legend of Korra
2013: Sam & Cat; Wendell & Vinnie, The Thundermans; The Haunted Hathaways; See Dad Run; Instant Mom
2014: Every Witch Way; Henry Danger; Max & Shred; Nicky, Ricky Dicky & Dawn
2015: Bella and the Bulldogs; 100 Things to Do Before High School (I'm counting it as a 2015 series given the ridiculously half-year gap between the pilot and the actual show); Game Shakers; Talia in the Kitchen; Make it Pop
2016: *shrug* (no not an actual show title I just have no idea what's premiering if anything)

That's 19 shows, which is quite a lot (not surprising given that 15 shows made their exit during the same time period, and a good chunk of titles of both lists are mutual). Speaking of which, a more useful statistic is that of those 19, no less than 10 of those shows that aired during that same time period also ended within that time. Again, that's expected because as far as tween shows are concerned that's pretty much a lifetime. An even more useful statistic is that 6 of those shows were premature cancellations. That's about a 62% success rate. I'm sure someone can tell me how that compares to whatever statistically useful standard would apply to a tween network like this, or if I get about to researching it myself. Meanwhile, only two shows premiered from 2014 are confirmed to be returning in 2016, only one show premiered from 2013 will still be airing episodes in 2016, and absolutely no show that premiered in 2012 survives to this day (and in fact only one, Korra, even managed to last beyond a single season). 

So how does Disney Channel compare?

2012: Gravity Falls, Dog With a Blog
2013: Liv and Maddie, Wander Over Yonder (again counting it as a Disney Channel show since it premiered on that network)
2014: I Didn't Do It, Girl Meets World
2015: K.C. Undercover; Best Friends Whenever; Bunk'd
2016: (scheduled/confirmed to what I've been updated on) Blizaardvark (yes that's a real show title), Stuck in the Middle

Of further note both Jessie and Austin & Ally barely miss out on this list, premiering very late in 2011 (especially Austin & Ally's November 2011 premiere date)

That's 11 shows counting the two I know for a fact are scheduled for a 2016 premiere (though I think there might be one or two still) but considering shows that have yet to actually premiere as of this writing to be outliers, that gives us 9 shows that premiered on Disney Channel during that time period. Of those 9 shows, only 3 came to an end within that period and only 1 was a premature cancelation (IDDI, natch). Needless to say that's waaaay better than Nick's success rate at a whopping 89%, though it tips a little bit in favor of Nick when you factor in the fact that Gravity Falls and Wander Over Yonder got banished to XD during that time as well. It very roughly restores itself though if you simply count Gravity Falls and Wander Over Yonder to be completely XD shows. Breaking down the stats by year, only one premiere from 2014 is still with us (GMW), while both of 2013's premieres are still with us, and nothing from 2012 or older remains (with Gravity Falls just airing its series finale, Jessie airing its finale back during Monstober and A&A scheduled for next week or so - close enough). 

So yeah, while Nickelodeon has a higher number of show premieres during that period, there's a pretty clear reason for it. Right now Disney Channel is whomping Nickelodeon's butt going by this set of arbitrary criteria during this arbitrary time period, but the ratings game just isn't the same right now as it was in 2013. There's enough Neilsen ratings instability to suggest all sorts of things could be happening in the new year to come, and much potential for sudden upsets or even mutual downfall.